Mr. Creepy Rates Hollywood's Latest Cheese!
Monday, December 26, 2005
  Rental (sort of): Troy

3. Blockbuster sent me a coupon for a free previously viewed movie from a short list of DVDs they apparently have warehouses full of. So I chose Troy, as I hadn't seen it yet. A touch long (2h 40m) and paced a little slow. While I'm sure he looked nice to the chicks, Brad Pitt just didn't sell the role to me... He was always "Brad Pitt pretending to be Achiles." Eric Bana was good as Hector. And it was nice to see Peter O'toole in something. (He played it old school, which worked fine for King Priam.) Wish they'd found someone more appropriate for Helen, though who could undisputedly play "the woman who launched a thousand ships"? The fight scenes were very well choreographed. Maybe I should have chosen The Grudge, but it was enjoyable.... more enjoyable than Ishtar.
 
  Rental: Coach Carter

5. Samuel L. Jackson is almost on that personal list of actors whose movies I'll go see no matter what they are. I took a pass on this in the theaters, mainly because I had other stuff to do, but I wouldn't have been disappointed if I'd seen a nice matinee. It's one of those uplifting movies that make you think there must really be people in the world like this (there aren't) and that someday they'll change the world (they won't). It's kind of the same feeling I got watching the first few seasons of West Wing. When Blockbuster has a nice sale, pick this up.
 
  Rental: Spanglish

1. I've always had a weakness for comedians in dramatic roles ...as well as one for Penelope Cruz. But both these actors, as well as Tea Leoni, couldn't elevate this movie beyond bored, late-night fare. In the end, I was left with the feeling of "so what was the point?"
 
  Rental: The Interpreter

0. Had a night in at the movies last week. One rental was The Interpreter. I now wish it hadn't been. What a flaming disappointment and waste of a promising story concept (as well as 5 bucks and 2 hours of my life). This is yet another of those movies that proves the rule that you can get as many quality actors as you want, but if the script is poo, the actors will not elevate the movie above that status. Do yourself a favor... Watch the trailer, imagine what an interesting movie this could be.... then go watch something else, secure in the knowledge that what you just imaged was much better than the actual movie.
 
  King Kong

10. A soft 10, perhaps, as you may not need to see this several times in the theater, but by god, I'd be happy to sit through this 3 hour & 40 minute bladder buster two or three times, and I'll probably want the Directorzilla Edition DVD.

I was prepared to say Peter Jackson was a one-trick pony with the Lord of the Rings trilogy (certainly a 10 on the MC Scale, btw), but he clearly proves he has a creative eye and perfect perception of production depth with King Kong. This thing embodies the word "spectacle" (and I suppose, by extension, "spectacular"). I've seen a lot of movies in my days, and I've gotten pretty jaded to cinematic magic, but Jackson produces a sense of scale and vertigo in this film that had me checking my balancing in my seat... many times. I feel enriched knowing I have seen a version of Kong, dedicated to the original story, done as well as it will ever be done.

Naomi Watts is terrific and deserves an Oscar nod come January (though she probably won't get one). Adrien Brody is.... good. While I like Jack Black as a comedic actor, he's really miscast in this film. (The story behind his casting, that he was cast at the insistance of Jackson's children, is somewhat infurating.... I smell the distinctive tang of George Lucas.) A more serious actor would have done the role better service. (I don't know who exactly ....Anthony Hopkins? ....Steve Buschemi? ....Philip Seymour Hoffman?)

Don't be lured into seeing this film based on the advertising that it's as much a romance as a monster flick. (It's not. By any stretch of the imagination.) Go see it because it's fantastic.
 
  The Chronicles of Narnia

8. Best performance by a beaver in a dramatic role. No, really. I was impressed. If Lucas had waited a few years for this level of virtual emotion-conveying CGI technology before doing his godawful Star Wars prequels, they might have been much better.

Naaah.

Maybe I was predisposed to it by all the media hype, but the religious overtones rubbed me wrong throughout movie. If I'm in the mood to have that in my face at the theater, I'll see Passion of the Christ. Anyway.... not fantastic, but a solid film, worth seeing.
 
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
 






















































































































 
My Photo
Name:
Location: Chicago-ish, IL
ARCHIVES
December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / December 2006 / February 2007 / March 2007 / March 2008 / August 2008 / March 2009 /


Powered by Blogger

What's this all about?

This blog is basically for me... so I can remember what the hell I watched over the years. If it saves you some time and money, so much the better. But rather than use some lame-ass rating system where even a "5" can designate a really stank movie, I've chosen to use the brilliant Creepy Scale at which "1" is the point at which the film is even remotely worth seeing. Anything lower than that a 1, and your time would be better spent in a coma or stabbing yourself repeatedly in the thigh with a fork. Allow me to explain:

The Creepy Scale© of movie rating:

  0   For the love of god, no! It's two whole hours of your life that you'll be begging to have back! Not only is this not worth seeing, it may well be worth not seeing.

  1   If, while flipping through network TV channels in some dive motel, your choices are this or the Weather Channel... choose this. The parts they edit out for network broadcast won't make a bit of difference.

  2   Let's be realistic. Of course you're going to go out and see that annoying old college room mate over a few beers. But set the VCR for this as you're headed out the door. Some night at 3:00 am when the insomnia's kicked in and you're thinking about calling him again, pop this in instead. You won't feel like you wasted your night this time.

  3   Rent it if Blockbuster is out of new releases or you need to rent a movie that can be made substancially more fun by watching with a bunch of friends. It'll be better than Ishtar, I gaurentee.

  4  Movies like this make it worth subscribing to the premium movie channel of your choice just so you can avoid the year long wait that it takes to reach regular TV.

  5   It'll be great on your balls-nasty home theater system. And you'll feel all financially smug knowing you waited for it.

  6   Got a free movie pass? Now's the time, baby! The only thing seperating this from a good rental is that there's something about it that you should see on a whopping big theater screen or surrounded by the unwashed masses with bathtubs full of greasy overpriced popcorn.

  7  The Scenario: You have 2 hours worth of afternoon to waste and you're out of clean underwear. You can either go see this flick or do some laundry. Settle into those skid marks for one more day and get out there.

  8   Go ahead, take the afternoon off for a nice matinee. You'll feel like a wealthy man knowing you saw this film and only paid 5 bucks to do it.

  9   The traffic, the crowd, the wallet sucking full price admission, and the 6 dollar Twislers..... By the time you leave the theater after seeing this, they'll have all been worth it.

  10  No matter how many times you see it, this one's entertaining every single time. You won't mind paying full price for it again and again, and you'll probably want to own it as soon at it's out on DVD.